A Mumbai classes courtroom on Tuesday imposed a Rs 100 token value advantageous on cricketer Prithvi Shaw for failing to post his answer in a molestation case filed via social media influencer Sapna Gill. The courtroom granted Shaw yet another alternative to reply to Gill’s legal revision petition, which demanding situations a Justice of the Peace courtroom’s previous resolution not to check in an FIR in opposition to the cricketer.The classes courtroom had in the past issued more than one requests for Shaw to reply to Gill’s petition. Regardless of a last caution throughout the closing listening to, Shaw didn’t document his answer via Tuesday’s listening to.
“Nonetheless, yet another probability is granted for a price of Rs 100,” the pass judgement on said earlier than scheduling the following listening to for December 16.Gill’s lawyer, Recommend Ali Kaashif Khan, expressed issues about Shaw’s habits in courtroom, pointing out: “This has been his common manner of dealing with the case in spite of being summoned again and again.”The case originates from an incident at an Andheri pub in Mumbai on February 15, 2023. Police stories point out that Gill’s buddy, Shobit Thakur, again and again asked selfies with Shaw round 1 am, resulting in an issue after Shaw declined additional picture requests.The placement escalated when Shaw used to be leaving the venue together with his buddy Ashish Surendra Yadav. Consistent with police accounts, Thakur used to be allegedly attacked with a baseball bat, whilst Shaw escaped unhurt. A gaggle of six people, together with Thakur and Gill, allegedly chased Yadav and demanded Rs 50,000.Police therefore registered a case in opposition to the crowd, resulting in Gill’s detention on February 17, 2023. She used to be launched on bail 3 days later.Gill’s model of occasions differs considerably from the police account. She alleges that Shaw and Yadav had invited her and Thakur to enroll in them at their VIP desk for beverages. Consistent with her grievance, when Thakur asked selfies, Shaw and Yadav assaulted him.Gill claims that once she tried to interfere, Shaw bodily and sexually assaulted her. She filed a counter-complaint in opposition to the cricketer, accusing him of attack, molestation, and outraging her modesty.The Justice of the Peace courtroom to start with declined to check in an FIR in keeping with Gill’s grievance, as a substitute ordering a police inquiry into the topic. Disillusioned with this resolution, Gill approached the classes courtroom with a legal revision petition in April 2024.The case stays ongoing, with Shaw now required to pay the token advantageous and post his reaction earlier than the following listening to scheduled for December 16.