NEW DELHI: Congress on Wednesday mentioned that Rahul Gandhi’s suggest filed a commentary bringing up a “risk to his existence” with out consulting the chief or acquiring his consent.In a social media publish on X, Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate mentioned that Rahul “strongly disagrees” with the commentary and that his legal professional will withdraw the applying on Thursday.“Rahul Gandhi’s legal professional had filed a written commentary in court docket bringing up a risk to his existence with out consulting him or acquiring his consent,” Shrinate mentioned.“Rahul Gandhi strongly disagrees with this motion. Subsequently, his legal professional will withdraw this written commentary from the court docket day after today,” she added.Shrinate additionally hooked up Rahul’s legal professional Milind Pawar’s commentary during which he mentioned that the contents of the applying have been drafted via him with out consulting Rahul.This comes hours after Pawar, in a written utility, instructed a Pune court docket that Rahul is dealing with a “risk to existence” from the complainant in a defamation case associated with his remarks in opposition to Savarkar, Bar and Bench reported.Within the utility submitted to the court docket, it was once mentioned that the complainant is an instantaneous descendant of Nathuram Godse and that “preventive coverage is not just prudent however is a constitutional legal responsibility upon the State.”“Given the documented historical past of violent and anti-constitutional dispositions connected to the complainant’s lineage… there exists a transparent, affordable, and considerable apprehension that Shri Rahul Gandhi would possibly face hurt, wrongful implication, or different kinds of concentrated on,” it was once submitted.“In view of the grave historical past related to such lineage, the defence harbours a real and affordable apprehension that historical past will have to now not be accepted to copy itself,” it added.Reacting to the plea, Satyaki Savarkar mentioned it was once frivolous, and filed with the aim of delaying the trial. “The details discussed within the utility via Gandhi don’t have anything to do with the prevailing case,” he instructed newshounds.What’s the case about?Satyaki Savarkar has filed a grievance in opposition to Gandhi, alleging that during a speech made in London in March 2023, the Congress chief claimed that V D Savarkar had written in a e-book that he and 5 to 6 of his buddies as soon as beat up a Muslim guy and he (Savarkar) felt glad.Satyaki Savarkar mentioned no such incident ever came about, and that V D Savarkar by no means wrote one of these factor any place.He has sought Gandhi’s conviction underneath Segment 500 IPC and reimbursement underneath Segment 357 CrPC.The court docket has already granted bail to Rahul within the case.